Sergey Karjakin Interviewed

Following his victory against Evgeny Tomashevsky

Sergei Karjakin 1

In the 2008 Chess Olympiad Sergey Karjakin played the 2nd board for Ukraine and narrowly lost a team medal in the final round. In the meantime, soon after winning the 2009 Corus tournament, Karjakin moved to Moscow and obtained Russian citizenship. At the 39th Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk he is representing Russia.

Being in excellent form, he is the striking force of the Russia 1 team, having collected 5.5 points from six games. In the 7th round his victory against Evgeny Tomashevsky was decisive for the positive result in the match against the very strong Russia 2 team.

In round 8, Russia 1 is set to match Karjakin’s former country – Ukraine. Bellow is an interview given for the Olympiad official website.

- Your game decided the match. Did you feel nervous?

- No, I was calm. Just did my job. We played the Ruy Lopez, and I didn’t get any significant advantage out of the opening. There was a lot of maneuvering, and the game was fairly balanced, but I didn’t want to take a draw, because the position was full of life. And at some point I found an interesting attacking possibility…

- This was probably the turning point of the game. Do you agree that Tomashevsky started looking uncomfortable after that?

- Yes, your observation seems to be correct. He started blundering, and I used it well.

- At the end when Tomashevsky was about to resign, you suddenly sunk into thought for a long time.

- The game was too important, so I tried to calculate everything flawlessly. I didn’t want to spoil the effort. I developed a mating attack, but the material was even, and if Black defended, I’d have serious problems.

- The first team won – is this a fair result?

- I think so. You have to admit that our team is a little bit stronger.

- Did you follow your teammates’ games?

- Of course! I noticed that Grischuk and Svidler had better positions. Peter played very aggressively was close to a win, but Vitiugov managed to hold.

- Have they congratulated you on this victory already?

- Yes. We took two very important points.

- Your former team, Ukraine, is leading after 7 rounds. Do you feel any regrets about changing the citizenship?

- Not at all. I have excellent relations with the Ukrainian players, but I’ll forget about friendship tomorrow – this match may determine the Olympiad winner. It will be a great fight! And I hope Russia wins.

- Are you sure that you’ll play in the match?

- It will be decided before the match at the team meeting. But I am in an excellent form, I feel great and really want to play.

- How do you like working with the best Russian grandmasters?

- Everything is just fine. We support each other, and everybody is ready to share their ideas. I feel the integrity of the team. Working in such atmosphere is a great pleasure.

- What can you say about the organization of the Olympiad?

- Everything is superb. I was in Khanty-Mansiysk before, and the main problem was frosty weather. There is no such a problem now, so I cannot complain about anything.

Interview with Yury Dokhoyan

Trainer of the Russia 1 women Chess Olympiad team

Russia chess

After the victory in the third round the players of the Russia-1 women’s team Tatiana Kosintseva, Nadezhda Kosintseva, Valentina Gunina and their coach Yuri Dokhoyan were invited to give the press-conference to the journalists of the Olympiad Press Center and the next day they defeated Georgian team in the next round.

– Yury, are you satisfied with your team’s performance at the start of the tournament?

Yury Dokhoyan: Today’s game against national team of Slovakia was good; we had a lasting pressure on three boards at the same time right from the beginning. Tatiana and Nadezhda were playing rather confidently, Sasha Kosteniuk won a good game and Valentina, taking into account the result of the team, decided to make a draw to secure the overall victory in the 3rd round. In the 2nd round we committed a mistake, but in general I am satisfied with their play. In any case the games against major opponents are ahead.

– Who are the main opponents in the fight for the gold medals?

Yury Dokhoyan: They are placed strictly according to the Rating: Ukraine, China and Georgia.
They are strong teams that have won high-level tournaments many times.

– Everyone is expecting only one result from Russia-1 team – the 1st place. Tatiana, playing on the 1st board, do you feel the responsibility for the final result?

Tatiana Kosintseva: Of course, I do, that’s why I will try to do my best in each round. However, it has nothing to do with the fact that I am playing on the 1st board here because I had to be the 1st board before and I have some experience in managing my emotions.

– Russian women’s national team is also remarkable for the fact that the Women’s World Champion is playing at the 3rd board. Is it a strategic decision?

Yury Dokhoyan: The board composition of the team is made according to the sport principle and to the Rating. I was ready to make an exception for the Women’s World Champion. She had the right to play on the 1st board and I suggested that to her. She chose the 3rd one, explaining it by the lack of practice. She decided that it would be better for the team, and eventually, her arguments convinced me. But in general, I believe that the World Champion in general is the one who can lead the team and represent it at the high level. He is there for that purpose.

– Now you are the coach of the sisters and you used to be the second of Garry Kasparov. With whom is it more interesting to work?

Yury Dokhoyan: They often ask me this questions. Till 2005 when Garry Kimovich gave up chess, I was his principal coach. Then our paths were separated – I started helping Tatiana and Nadezhda, what subsequently made me the Women’s national team’s coach. Now Tatiana and Nadezhda perform at the level of a strong Grandmaster and training them became very interesting. Moreover we are speaking of training the national team’s players.

– Nadezhda, have you ever argued with your sister for the board?

Nadezhda Kosintseva: I haven’t had any serious reasons to push my sister in a lower position. There was a moment when my rating was slightly higher than Tanya’s, but there were not any team competitions and I didn’t have chance to use this advantage. I just was not lucky (laughing).

– You are like Klichko-brothers, you never fight seriously against each other. An exception was made only in two games of the Blitz Chess Championship that ended before the Olympiad…

Т.К.: Indeed, in classical chess our games are resulted without any serous fight. I do not think that I have to explain the reason for that. Sisters are not supposed to argue. As for the Blitz tournament, we have agreed with Nadya right away that we will play seriously. Here is a paradox: we scored the same anyway. I want to underline that I like the idea of such tournaments itself, because women chess players do not have enough opportunities to play in the competitions on such elite level like Wejk-an-Zee, Bilbao and Linares. We have only FIDE Grand Prix and I am very happy about the fact that now we have the competitions of such scale where we can try ourselves out. I hope that it will remain traditional in the future.

– What are your relations out of chess?

Т.К.: .Very good. It happens that we quarrel but we always try to come to a diplomatic decision of the conflict.

N.К.: Yes,we prefer to sort things out in a blitz. We play very tense matches at home, it happens that games last for hours and no one is ready to give up till the end. We do not find compromises in this case.

– Tatiana, was this year successful for you?

Т.К.: It is too early to speak about the results; the year is not finished yet. There are so many tournaments ahead of us and so far I am happy to have played in “Grand Prix” series where I performed very well and gained experience.

– Nadezhda, do you feel tired?

N.К.: No, I don’t. The thing is that from tournament to another the game becomes more tense. Olympiad is a very serious tournament and moreover it is taking place in our own country. It is possible that teams who are not favorites show the best results. That is why one has to be always in a very good shape and I hope that we will continue playing better and cope with stress.

– Girls, could you tell us about your holidays?

N.К.: Before the Olympiad we had a chance to go to Anapa to have some rest, enjoy the sea and get suntanned. We need it very much, moreover before that we played a very long series of tournaments. We got very tired and this trip let us regain strength before the Olympiad.

V.G.: I also went to the seaside to Tunis. I am in the 5th year of the university and soon I will be getting a diploma, therefore I will hardly have time to rest in the nearest future.

– Valentina, I see a toy on your knees .Who is this?

Valentina lifts up her teddy toy and answers modestly, “This is my talisman.”

– Does it have a name?

This is Tigger from “Winnie the Pooh” cartoon.

– And do the sisters have their talisman?

N.К.: Unfortunately not. We are good friends with Valya’s Tiger.

More on the official website.

Georgia at the Chess Olympiad

Interview with Baadur Jobava and the team captain

Jobava Baadur

In the 4th round the leader of the Georgian national team Baadur Jobava defeated the world number one Magnus Carlsen. After the match Baadur Jobava and his captain Tamaz Georgadze shared their impressions from the Olympiad and answered other questions for the official website.

- Tamaz, did you expect that Baadur beats Carlsen?

Tamaz Georgazde: When Baadur is in good shape and mood, he can beat anyone, and I know it. Before the game I suggested to play more accurately – after all, he is playing against Carlsen, and suffered a loss in the previous round. However, you can’t argue with Jobava – even in a drawn position he always looks for an attack! Today he managed to find several excellent moves in approximately even position, and the opponent was unable to find proper countermeasures. After that, Baadur was basically freerolling.

- Baadur, did you expect to beat Magnus, who usually loses just one or two games a year?

Baadur Jobava: After I lost to the Mexican player in the previous round, I had very aggressive intentions, although I did my best not to reveal them to my teammates. I played accurately, choosing a safe position where one can always go for a draw. At some point Carlsen overestimated his chances and started playing sharply for a win. Then he missed a couple of important replies and was unable to recover. Generally, I am happy! An opportunity to play the world number one does not come too often, not to mention beating him!

- Were you afraid of Carlsen? Did you know his weaknesses?

Baadur Jobava: Before this game our score was equal – we made two draws and won once each. However, our last meeting occurred in 2005, and it is obvious that Magnus made a huge progress since that time. As for the weaknesses, even computer has them, but discovering them overnight is a tough job, especially if you consider Carlsen’s versatility. So I just played chess.

- You defeated Vietnam in the round 5 and will now play against main favorites…

T. G.: We are ready to play against anyone, and fear no one. I promise there will be a big fight, and may the strongest win.

- Baadur, the first board competition is very tough. You will face Aronian, Kramnik, Ivanchuk… Do you fear any of these people?

Baadur Jobava: I have never been afraid to play stronger and more experienced opponents. Maybe it helped me to become a professional player. Now I have experience too. You should never play scared!

- Were there any changes in your life since your last visit to Khanty-Mansiysk?

Baadur Jobava: My understanding of life has changed a lot. I met a girl from Ukraine at one of the tournaments, and we got married. Now sheexpects a child. The fact that I have a family gives me additional strength…

Hao Wang wants China to be in top 3 in the Olympiad

Interview from Khanty Mansiysk

Wang Hao

Interview with the 2010 China champion and winner of Bosna 2010

Hao Wang: The first game turned out not to be very difficult, but somehow I feel very tired…

– Which result will be considered successful for your team?

Hao Wang: It will be difficult to compete with such teams as Russia and Ukraine. We should be satisfied with winning the medals of any kind.

– And the women’s team obviously aims for the gold?

Hao Wang: Oh yes, no doubt about that. And we will support them as much as we can.

– Li, how many years do you play chess?

Li Wengliang (team captain): 30 years already. And I am a captain of the national team for about 10 years.

– What kind of souvenirs will you take home to your family and friends?

Li Wengliang: I will definitely bring chess and chess books, especially those in Russian.

– Did you have any worries about traveling to Siberia? This land is famous for its frosty weather.

Li Wengliang: The climate in my native province of China is very similar, so I don’t mind.

– What do you think about Khanty­-Mansiysk?

Li Wengliang: I live in Beijing, and the air here is much cleaner than in my city. Also Russian people are wonderful and very friendly. In addition, I admire Russian culture!

Interview for the Olympiad official website

Interview with Anna Muzychuk during the Chess Olympiad

Her sister has birthday on September 21st

Anna Muzychuk sq

- Anna, your sister is 18 today. DO you have a surprise for her?

- I have not seen her yet today but of course I have prepared a present for her in advance I think we shall meet during the game. And in the evening we will try to celebrate her birthday with our teams and friends.

– Is it often the case that you celebrate your birthdays away from home?

- It happens. Professional chess players play a lot.

- Being an elder sister do you take care of Mariya?

- Usually we stay together. And this time it turned out that we are accommodated in different hotels. We play for different teams. She plays for Ukraine and I represent the team of Slovenia.

- Is your sister one of the youngest in the Ukrainian team?

- She is the youngest. Actually we have started playing chess early as well. Our parents started training us when we were 2. They had been out coaches for a long time

- Have you called her the first at midnight to congratulate on her birthday?

- No, I have not. I called her in the morning. We follow the regime. It is not professional to wake her up at midnight before the tournament even for the sake of her birthday.

- Where did you meet your 18th birthday yourself?

- I have to recall on it. I might have been at home, I do not remember exactly. (laughing)

- Have you thought of something special for your sister today?

- We will try to celebrate her birthday so that she likes it. Of course we shall not make a big party, we will get together only with the closest friends. There is another problem-we have just checked in and we have no idea who is placed where. Someone will be able to come and some not. I know that her team will be there.

mariya muzychuk
Corus Muzychuk

- Will there be any birthday cake with candles served for her?

- We always have it at home. Here everything is more complicated. I do not know yet, maybe I will take care of it.

- You can always buy candles in the next-door shop.

- Yes, but I need 18, not only 1. (laughing)

- What can you tell us about your sister in one word?

- She is purposeful.

- What did you wish her when called her in the morning?

- I wished her good luck and so that all her dreams come true.

European Chess Expectations after the World Chess Olympiad

Interview with Theodoros Tsorbatzoglou

Theodoros Tsorbatzoglou

Theodoros Tsorbatzoglou, individual candidate for board member at the ECU elections, presented his future program in a talk with He is coming with direct solutions how to enhance the popularity and professionalism of the European Chess Union, with true understanding about the European chess player needs, and with direct ideas how to bring chess closer to the Olympic family.

Interesting preliminary read about ECU in focus here

ECU elections will take place in Khanty Mansiysk during the World Chess Olympiad 2010. What is the main point of your candidacy as individual board member?

I believe that ECU is an organization which is developing step by step and is trying to find its placement in the sports market, thus it should be guided by a long term marketing plan. Following hard and professional work by the board members, The sports’ sponsors will come to invest in chess only after we can ensure them that ECU is backed by hardworking and professional team, which can ensure additional value and benefit for their products and businesses – both socially and financially. I don’t believe in the money which is coming suddenly from the sky.

As an International Sports Organization we have both social and commercial mission and we are obliged to check the source and the motives of the all resources. It is important to keep our values and enhance the promotion of the great educational assets of our sport.

What are the member federations awaiting from the next ECU board?

I can tell you what the chess member federations are not awaiting from the ECU after the elections during the World Chess Olympiad in Khanty Mansiysk. First of all ECU Board is not meant for traveling, sightseeing, and delicious dinners. The members should be there to invest their energy, fantasy, new ideas, and fair decisions. Second, any elected member cannot have any professional position, or have current position in FIDE or National Federations that could be contradictory to his ECU position. For example elected members during their term cannot be arbiters in ECU events, cannot bid for ECU events, cannot compete professionally, and should not be managers of players because they represent all players.

I am coming with this proposal to Ganeral Assembly and I will ask from the twenty two candidates to sign it as memorandum before the elections! This way we can make a clear start and work on new statutes of the ECU.

So your candidacy is coming with multiple ideas. What are the first things you will propose to Board if you are be elected?

Being so many years part of professional sports organizations and having seen all levels of the market, there are indeed multiple ideas that need to be employed. However, some of them are of great importance and should be a fact as soon as possible.

A. Guidelines for all of our actions. We must stop deciding according political pressures, according to who is our friend. If we want to build a serious administration we should describe what our needs are and follow them strictly. This is how ECU should be a respectful organization, based not om personal relations, but ideas and professionalism.

B. Special rules and guidelines against Nationalism and Racism. Such appear in all professional Sports Federations and we have to act accordingly.

C. Change of statutes describing the incompatibility functions for ECU Board members (as explained earlier).

D. Signing of agreement with a major Sports Fashion Company. The dress code in major chess events will bring us closer to the Olympic family. Moreover, it will bring additional income for organizations and top players. I have already made the first talks with companies and am ready to present them.

E. Co-operation with GREENPEACE and WWF. Environmental policy becomes a major issue in the modern world. My proposal is in all ECU youth events to be an environmental presentation for the young people, thus contributing to the development of a environmental responsibility. I have done first steps on this during a recent chess event in Thessaloniki.

Read a recent article about ECU in focus by Theodoros Tsorbatzoglou here.

Theodoros Tsorbatzoglou

You mentioned several necesities for chess to be part of Olympic Games. Do you see this in the future?

The biggest bet for chess are the Olympic Games. However, the key are the Winter Olympic Games! Their popularity is 20% compared to the Summer Olympic Games, yet the games are equally important in the Olympic family. Imagine what will be the results for countries like India and China (for example) if Chess enters the Winter Olympics – their popularity will be doubled and the games will have television rights access in a larger spectrum of countries. This should be elaborated in a case study of the Marketing Department of the seven main Olympic Sponsors.

ECU is an organization depending on the global processes in Europe. How you see the general situation in the continent?

Let’s be honest, Europe is in a deep financial crisis, but even more in a social crisis. There is disappointment around with the politics and the insecurity for the future. I have always been a supporter a united and federal Europe – from Gibraltar to the Urals. A Europe with a central policy which will focuses on the needs of the people and the countries, just the one ECU should also apply.

How will FIDE elections effect the ECU elections?

FIDE is the main international chess sports organization and the elections in FIDE affect all the Chess World. It is normal everybody to have his opinion or to declare his support to candidates or programs. We have ECU elections, yet many people mix both and support the one or the other candidate for FIDE. What I want to say is that to be a supporter is not a positive administration qualification for a future ECU Board member. ECU need leaders and decision makers, not followers and clappers.

Why should the delegates to vote for you?

I have performed all the main chess and sports management roles. Having participated in sports administration (in chess, volleyball, basketball) gives me a wider picture of a sports market and a deeper view on how chess should be placed in a competitive and demanding environment. My experience in European Union projects (one part of my professional activities) gave me the opportunity to understand better the European history, culture, and local characteristics. I would also add that for me there are no west or east (politically) chess players, there are no big or small countries. In my eyes there are people with the same needs, dreams, equal rights, sharing their love for chess and life.

Download ECU candidacy / CV eng / Best games

Beatriz Marinello

No one is bigger than chess

Beatriz Marinello

Back in February (2010), I was approached by Mr. Michael Khodarkovsky who is the President of the Kasparov Chess Foundation and a U.S. Chess Federation’s FIDE Delegate. At that time, Michael Khodarkovsky informed me that GM Ron Henley wanted to talk to me about GM Anatoly Karpov running for FIDE President. He told me that Mr. Henley also asked for a meeting with him. I mentioned to Michael Khodarkovsky that I could not meet with Mr. Henley at the time, but maybe later. Early in March, I agreed to meet with Mr. Henley since I have known GM Henley for a long time and I always thought he was a nice person.

The same week, I received a letter from FIDE President, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov inviting me to be part of his electoral ticket. When I meet with Mr. Henley, he offered to appoint me as FIDE Vice President in Mr. Karpov’s Presidential Board and compensation for actively campaigning.

After carefully reviewing the situation, I considered that FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov was the best candidate as FIDE President, and I was highly supportive of his team as well.

I did not think that Former World Champions Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparov, both great players and important members of our community, were the best people to run FIDE.

In the past they were both chess enemies, and I considered how this could create potential issues between them, in case that GM Anatoly Karpov became FIDE President. I also thought, that their motivations were not in the best interest of FIDE and GM Karpov was lacking the necessary experience to run an organization such as FIDE.
Something just didn’t quite fit or feel right about this situation and I held firm in this belief.

Additionally, I also did not wish to divide the Americas, since we have been working for 10 years in building a block in the American Continents.

During this time it also became clear that the Karpov team was going to try to split the continent by dividing the Americas in hopes of gaining ground in that region.

My vision is for a united chess community, which is best represented by Mr. Ilyumzhinov’s Ticket and his team.

Once I made the decision, I asked the U.S. Chess Federation’s Executive Board for a meeting, innocently I also included Michael Khodarkovsky as FIDE Delegate to join us in a conference call.

At the conference call, all members of the board (5) were present: President, Jim Berry; Vice President, Ruth Haring; VP of Finances, Randy Bauer; Members at Large, Michael Atkins and Bill Goichberg.

Mr. Goichberg is a former U.S. Chess Federation President and the main tournament organizer in the United States. Mr. Goichberg is very anti-FIDE and especially very anti-Kirsan Ilyumzhinov. I presented the situation to the Executive Board, Mr. Bauer got disconnected from the conference call, so he did not hear everything and did not vote. However, the Board took an unofficial vote. Mr. Berry and Ms. Haring voted ‘Yes’ to endorse me as a candidate in Mr. Ilyumzhinov’s ticket, Mr. Atkin said that he did not know enough, but was initially agreeable to support me, but decided to abstain, and Mr. Goichberg voted ‘No’ to my endorsement.

Acting on Mr. Khodarkovsky’s advice the Board postponed the meeting for two days later. At the time, I did not know that Mr. Kasparov was the person running the campaign for Mr. Karpov and Mr. Khodarkovsky clearly had a conflict of interest, since he works for the Kasparov Chess Foundation and he is also serving as USA FIDE Delegate.

During those two days, Grandmaster Kasparov and Grandmaster Henley made several phone calls asking the Board members not to endorse me in order to prevent me from joining Kirsan’s ticket and to only support Mr. Karpov. He even called a very influential person in U.S. Chess, who is also a major sponsor of the U.S. Chess Federation.

This whole situation reminded me of the 1994 Presidential FIDE Election, when the U.S. FIDE Delegate was Mr. Fan Adams and in a meeting held prior to the Chess Congress in Moscow, the U.S. Chess Federation decided to support the candidacy of Mr. Kouatly, but then after GM Kasparov’s phone calls to members of the U.S. Chess Federation’s Board, the United States changed their position at the last minute in favor of FIDE President Mr. Campomanes, resulting in the resignation of Mr. Adams. Back then, many promises were made but nothing happen in the end.

Now, back to March, 2010, two days after we had a conference call, we met again over the phone with the members of the Federation’s Executive Board, Mr. Khodarkovsky and GM Henley. Karpov’s team made a new offer to me in exchange for me not accepting Kirsan Ilyumzhinov’s invitation to be a member of his electoral ticket. The offer was an appointment in GM Karpov’s Presidential Board (in the event that he won the election) and full support to become Continental President. In addition they would not require that I campaign on behalf of Mr. Karpov.

I told them that I would not accept the offer. One hour later, Bill Hall, USCF Executive Director and Ms. Haring called me to tell me that I should accept the offer or else they would not endorse me and that they would even remove me as Zonal President.
By then it became clear that I was dealing with a very undemocratic organization, and the way in which they were pressuring me and trying to force me to accept Karpov’s offer by use of threats, convinced me more than ever that I was making the right decision.

I did not accept the offer, the board did not remove me as Zonal President, but the U.S. Chess Federation sent me a letter denying me the endorsement and making a statement that they would not support anyone who is on Mr. Ilyumzhinov’s ticket.

Fortunately, the National Federations of Chile and Brazil gave me an endorsement since I am also a member of these Federations.

Who is Beatriz Marinello

From a very early age I came to the realization that I wanted chess to be a very important part of my life and have since dedicated my life to chess for the past 33 years. From the beginning I knew that the opportunities for chess players, especially women in chess were extremely limited. For this reason, I have dedicated most of my life to the development and promotion of chess, acting in different capacities.

I was born in Chile and have resided in the USA for about 20 years. I love both countries, but consider myself a citizen of the world.

My chess career began in 1979 when I started playing chess at Club Chile in the city of Santiago. The first time I won the Chilean Women’s Championship was in 1981, and I won this championship every year from 1984-1989.

Although, my home Federation is the United States, I have strong ties to Chile, and I remain an active member of the Chilean chess community, as well as other Nations in the American Continent (from Canada to Chile) where in my capacity as the General Secretary of FIDE America, I have the opportunity to assist in many of the chess activities taking place in this part of the world.

Most of my involvement in U.S. Chess has been as a chess promoter, scholastic chess and in leadership roles. I have been instrumental in the development of scholastic chess in the United States, and I worked for the U.S. Chess Federation from 1997-2000 as a National Scholastic Director.

Eventually, I became President of the U.S. Chess Federation (2003-2005), and I have been a member and currently Co-Chair of the Scholastic Chess Council . Currently, I am the Zonal President of Zone 2.1. (USA).

In 2008, I was awarded Chess Educator of the Year (UTD), where I also received acknowledgement for my dedication to chess and education. I focused on “chess and the development of social skills for at-risk-children”, which I strongly believe in and is a primary concern for me as I promote chess in the global chess community.

“Marinello has a long list of credits in establishing scholastic chess programs in New York City and has devoted many years to chess education for the U.S. Chess Federation (USCF). In 2003 she became the first woman president of the USCF after serving as that organization’s National Scholastic Director.”

“She has been important for the USCF not only in chess education but in overall leadership,” said Stallings, Director of the UTD Chess Program. “Ms. Marinello is also quite an accomplished tournament player. In fact, she became National Women’s Champion of Chile when she was 16 years old.”

As I mentioned, I had offers to collaborate with both candidates for FIDE President. I have great respect for the top players, especially our former World Champions.

I hoped from the beginning that these campaigns would concentrate on presenting the best programs and that they would focus on their contributions for chess development and promotion stressing their position on what each candidate and team could offer.

I do not believe in negative campaigning, and although I am very disappointed with my home federation (USA) for not supporting me, I will not attack or do anything that can damage the U.S. Chess Federation or any other chess organization for that matter.

Resorting to such tactics is against the very thing we are trying to do in the “One World. One Vision.” campaign and it is against everything I have done to promote chess on a National and International level.

I will not stoop to our opponents level by using the methods they have implemented from the beginning of this election which are harmful to the global chess community. I will simply tell my story as it occurred.

More on

Interview with Mr. Ion-Serban Dobronauteanu

A step forward for European Chess

Ion Serban Dobronauteanu

How did you become a member of Silvio Danailov’s ticket?

I think that the way I became a member of Silvio Danailov’s ticket is a very good example of how a relation in the field of chess could start and evolved. The first occasion when I met with Silvio was in 2006 for the match between Veselin Topalov and Dieter Nisipeanu, who were at that moment World Champion and European Champion respectively. I was impressed by Silvio’s attitude as a manager of the World Champion when preparing the match and afterwards during the match. It was really a big pleasure for me to received as guests in Romania two personalities of the modern chess: Veselin Topalov and Silvio Danailov. After this first meeting, we continued to stay in touch and despite Silvio’s busy schedule he always finds time to share to me some of his thoughts and experience.

Having in mind the good cooperation between Romanian and Bulgarian chess federations, we both considered that we could do a good job together in the ECU board.

What is your experience related with this kind of organizations as European Chess Union?

I would say that I have more than a decade experience of being an active member of leading national professional organizations (in wine sector), with activity in European wine associations as well. During the last four years I attend at the meetings of ECU and FIDE and for example, based on my experience, the last year I had some contribution in elaborating the amendments for the statutes of ECU.

You led the Romanian Chess Federation for 4 years. What are some of your achievements?

In our federation it was needed a total reconstruction. Chess lovers can remember some strange facts that happened in the past. There was a great support from our members for a new start and we succeeded in some directions as: almost doubling of the rated competitions in our country, doubling of the registered (active) players, many closed and open tournaments with a certain regional importance. We were interested to develop a good foreign relations, especially with neighbour and Balkan countries, we are positive about Association Francophonique and any other international opportunity.

What are the members waiting from the next ECU board?

I can say what I am waiting from the next ECU board: it is time to make a step forward for the European chess. There were good periods and strong progress of the chess along the Europe – the spread level, increasing number of participants in continental and regional competitions, growing interest in a numerous countries, it is now the time that all these things should be much better developed by and through ECU. I do believe that our team has the right vision and expertise to put these into practice. According to discussions with many delegates and chess friends, they are waiting for a smooth cooperation across Europe and focusing of the Union’s energy on constructive objectives.

How is your team different from the other candidate teams?

We all are proud to be part of this team, we have a top level leader – Silvio Danailov, who has an excelent experience in the field of professional chess and who knows very well how chess is going on the other continents. I’d like to say that we represent the central option for the European chess, not only from the point of view of the geographical origin of the ticket members, but also because we are as close as to any continental regions. Starting from this position, we can work for a better cooperation between the national chess federations and for a better European Chess Union.

Now we are near to the final stage of the election campaigns. How these campaigns appear according to you?

Despite that everyone consider that the periods before the elections are in some way boring and full of unrealistic promises, one can see that the candidates are having some interesting strategies and projects.

Basically it is good that there are several candidates (at least two, I could say :) ) and all these energies will help finally to all of us to get closer to the real objectives and to a better ECU. The things for FIDE are more complicated and at a very large scale, the candidates are making great efforts and I hope that the winner will not need a long rest afterwards.

More at

Mr. Ion-Serban Dobronauteanu (Romania)-Vice President-CV

Mr. Ion-Serban Dobronauteanu is born in 1968. He has degrees from the Polytechnic University and the Academy of Economic Studies in Bucharest. Presently he studies PhD in agricultural economics. Speaks Romanian, English and French.

Mr. Dobronauteanu is shareholder and Deputy General Manager of Euro Trade Invest SA (trade with food and non-food goods) and shareholder and Export Coordinator of Murfatlar Romania SA (wines production). He is President and Vice – President of Wine National Interprofessional Organization and National Vineyard Growers and Wine Producers Association.

Ion-Serban Dobronauteanu is National Chess Master (ELO 2215). As a junior he was a member of rewarded teams at the National Team Championship.

Organizer of many Open Bucharest Tournament editions and numerous national chess events. Responsible for organizing and financing of Anatoli Karpov vs. Andrei Istratescu (2005) and Veselin Topalov vs. Dieter Nisipeanu (2006) matches.

Mr. Dobronauteanu is member of the Organizing Commitee of Kings Tournament-Bazna, Romania. President of the Romanian Chess Federation, January 2006-february 2010. Founding member, President and Vice-President (by rotation) of the Balkanic Chess Federation.

Ion-Serban Dobronauteanu is initiator of the Balkanic Chess Circuit “Grand Prix”. In present, Permanent Delegate to FRS at FIDE and ECU.

Statement of the FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov

Regarding the FIDE elections and the 81st FIDE Congress

Kirsan Ilyumzhinov square

As the whole chess community is aware, on the 29th of September 2010 in Khanty-Mansiysk the FIDE Presidential elections will take place, during the 81st FIDE Congress. There are two candidates – citizens of Russia – the incumbent FIDE President and ex-World Champion Anatoly Karpov. To date, 93 out of 167 National Federations with voting rights have openly expressed their support to my ticket. At the electoral site of my opponent, only flags of 23 countries can be found.

I would like to stress that I have been always a protagonist of chess being beyond politics, for our National Federations to have full freedom in their activities, based on the principles of democracy. At the same time, unfortunately, from the very start, the electoral campaign of Anatoly Karpov and leaders of his headquarters Garry Kasparov and Richard Conn, has become a political confrontation. From the very beginning their actions have been destructive, aimed at the schism of the chess world and National Federations to serve their political ambitions, which have nothing to do with chess life.

We have witnessed this in Russia when before the opening of the Russian Chess Federation Congress, 43 Regional federations openly expressed their support to me, while Anatoly Karpov has had only 5 of the regions to support him. Nevertheless, through an open violation of the Federation’s Statutes, demagogy and even open pressure over the Supervisory Board members, they made an effort to paralyze the work of the RCF. The Chairman of the RCF Supervisory Board A. Dvorkovich has twice informed FIDE on the RCF position in respect of support to me as the FIDE Presidential candidate. However, Anatoly Karpov and his headquarters are continuously misinforming the public, stating that it is Karpov who is an official candidate from Russia.

Such destructive tactics, where “any means to an end”, is used by A. Karpov, G. Kasparov and R. Conn in many countries of the world, including those which officially and openly expressed their support at the forthcoming elections. Especially vividly it is seen in some Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Peru etc), where G. Kasparov and R. Conn have organised open pressure to the local Federations and their Presidents from the part of state bodies. There is an extensive campaign in local media, designed to force the Presidents who are not “disagreeable”, to resign. This looks particularly strange, considering the fact that G. Kasparov feels that he is an adherent of democratic principles. From my side, I would like to assure everyone that National Federations and their respective Presidents will not be left without our support.

For the record, as a Russian citizen, it is not pleasant for me to see and read some interviews of G. Kasparov to foreign media, where he is expressing open aggression towards the country and its leader. Here we mean the country which has provided Mr. Kasparov with shelter and protection during his difficult moments, and which has contributed immensely to his personality growth and professional success. The inept and destructive actions of G. Kasparov in the political arena hugely damage the international chess movement and Russia’s prestige at the world arena.

In the light of above, it is extremely strange that Anatoly Karpov has picked as his accomplice and is expressing the interests of a person with such a record of destruction of all the organisations and projects where he has taken part. The chess world does remember his break away from FIDE in the early 90s, creation of Grandmasters Association, his efforts to create alternative World Championships under “Brain Games” patronage etc. Now Mr. Kasparov once again is trying to split the chess world, bringing chaos and upset into our chess family. As a result, in place of an electoral campaign, aimed at the competiveness of electoral programmes, ideas of future development of our Federation and chess as a whole, we see and hear a set of populist rhetoric and faultfinding. Their entire electoral campaign is reduced to attempts of political pressure, split of National Federations and personal insults.

I would like to remind that FIDE is not a place for political showdown, and, as other International Sports Federations, we shall not allow any direct interference of state bodies into the matters of National Federations. We shall not allow destruction of our united chess world and we leave a right for ourselves for any appropriate actions!

Gens Una Sumus!

We are one family

Kirsan Ilyumzhinov

FIDE President